IGTF Levels of Authentication Assurance
The IGTF Authentication Profiles describe a technology-agnostic assurance level that represent the IGTF consensus on achievable trustworthy authentication seen from both the relying party pooint of view as well as being a feasible level for identity service providers to achieve for a variety of scenarios.
Traditionally assurance levels have been identified on a single scale. In terms of a single linear scale, relying parties have often considered authorities compliant with ASPEN (PKI implementation: SLCS), BIRCH (PKI implementation: MICS), or CEDAR (PKI implementation: Classic Secured) to be similar in terms of assurance level, and authorities compliant with DOGWOOD (PKI implementation: IOTA) to be different. In this document, several aspects are separated and relying parties may find more fine-grained controls.
- Current version: 1.1 (endorsed by all PMAs):
Adobe PDF format
MS Word format
- Managed by: EUGridPMA
- Document revision history: https://www.eugridpma.org/guidelines/authn-assurance
- Document identifier: urn:oid:1.2.840.1136188.8.131.52.1
Assurance Profile ID Policy identifier Specific renderings ASPEN urn:oid:1.2.840.1136184.108.40.206.1 PKI: SLCS BIRCH urn:oid:1.2.840.1136220.127.116.11.2 PKI: MICS CEDAR urn:oid:1.2.840.113618.104.22.168.3 PKI: Classic DOGWOOD urn:oid:1.2.840.113622.214.171.124.4 PKI: IOTA